“… propagandists are well aware that in order to reach someone, one must first convince him that propaganda is ineffectual and not very clever. Because he is convinced of his own superiority, the intellectual is much more vulnerable than anybody else to this maneuver… [intellectuals are] the most vulnerable of all to modern propaganda, for three reasons: (1) they absorb the largest amount of secondhand, unverifiable information; (2) they feel a compelling need to have an opinion on every important question of our time, and thus easily succumb to opinions offered to them by propaganda on all such indigestible pieces of information; (3) they consider themselves capable of ‘judging for themselves.’”
– Jacques Ellul, Propaganda: The Formation of Men’s Attitudes (1965)
“Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.”
– Frank Herbert, Dune (1965)
There is a child who needs to take a house key every morning in order to get into the house after school, and since he has a record of often forgetting the key, every morning his mother asks him if he has his key. He usually answers, “Yes” with a marked displeasure at being reminded. Is the mother wrong to ask when her concern proves to be unnecessary on the days the child didn’t forget to take his key? Of course not. She has no regrets about being wrong, given past experiences with forgotten keys.
This situation provides a simplified analogous answer to why citizens should not just shut up and “listen to the science” (a noxious phrase that should be avoided) as our lives are being upended in response to a viral pandemic. Supposedly, it is wrong now to ask question the Covid-19 reaction and question the official lines put out by government, the scientific establishment and the pharmaceutical industry. People who ask questions are denigrated as “covidiots” and “granny killers.” Dissenting opinions are being erased from social media and dismissed with ridicule by self-appointed “fact-checkers” without the dissenters’ questions being seriously addressed.
In this blog post I’m posting a transcript of an interview with a dissenting medical expert, Dr. Lee Merritt. The video of the interview was censored by YouTube a few days after it appeared. It is sure to be seen as outrageous and dangerous by those who have submitted to being locked down, masked, and soon vaccinated by government decree. Such people need to ponder the quotes at the top of this post—as do I or anyone else who attempts “judging for themselves.” We all have to question our beliefs and how we got them.
I don’t accept as truth everything Dr. Merritt says, especially her belief that China would engage in biowarfare to do a “takedown of America”. China has nothing to gain and much to lose by making America more unstable and irrational than it is already. The suspects in an attempt to take down America are more likely to be found in powerful financial interests that exist outside of China. It is possible that the same elements that deployed a “strategy of tension“* throughout the world are now using it within “the homeland” to manipulate politics there—through deliberate acts and/or by exploiting unforeseen disasters as they emerge.
I am not in a position to evaluate whether the claims made in the interview are correct. Dr. Merritt’s concern about antibody-dependent enhancement has been addressed by critics who say this problem was dealt with during the development of the mRNA vaccine. Time will tell. Otherwise, Dr. Merritt addresses many of the obvious questions that millions of people want to ask, so this is an interview of great merit. There is no reason it should be censored or dismissed out of hand just because it goes against the official narrative. The child mentioned above needed to be checked merely because of his reputation for forgetfulness, but the government, the scientific establishment and the pharmaceutical industry have a history of disastrous mistakes and disinterest in public welfare. It is wise to interrogate everything they say and do. If some suspicions turn out to have been unfounded, there is no shame or regret in that. The questioning and the wrong hypotheses are just as essential as the truth that eventually comes out of the process of open debate and investigation.
Interview with Dr. Lee Merritt, January 14, 2021
Dr. Lee Merritt, interviewed by Alex Newman of The New American magazine.
Dr. Merritt is former president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS). In the interview, she explains her belief that America is currently facing what may be biological warfare. Whether the release of the COVID-19 virus was deliberate or accidental is impossible to know. As for the new vaccines, Dr. Merritt, a former military doctor who studied biological warfare, discusses previous animal studies on the technology underlying mRNA vaccines and raises some intriguing questions about what could possibly go wrong months or years later as vaccinated bodies react to new pathogens. Another important issue she raises is that vaccines are not necessary because the infection is short-lived and inconsequential for a very large majority of the population. For those who are more vulnerable, there are proven nutritional regimens and drugs that can treat viral infections.
Video link: https://www.bitchute.com/video/7nhmZi6rbKLu/ (banned by YouTube within a week of publication)
TRANSCRIPT (partial transcript, edited for clarity)
The interviewer’s questions are in italics.
Before all this happened [Covid-19], when I was just theoretically thinking about this, I thought about how warfare has changed over time. We started just hitting each other over the head with clubs, and then we went to set-piece battles, and then we went to—we Americans kind of pioneered guerrilla warfare—shooting behind trees, which the British thought was unsportsmanlike—and now in our lifetime we have what is called Conflict 4.0. I made this up before I ever even heard people now talking about fifth generation warfare, but that’s really what we’re talking about. 4.0 was when we were fighting, for example, ISIS or Al-Qaeda, and you knew maybe who the enemy was. By the rules of the Geneva Convention they appeared like a standing army. They had uniforms. They had training. They used group tactics and such, but you weren’t 100 per cent sure who the enemy was because you didn’t know who was funding them, who was sending them weapons, who was really doing the training. So there was plausible deniability, but what if you could take it the next step further to what some other people have called Warfare 5.0? What if you had a weapon that was so stealth that not only did you not know who the enemy was, but you didn’t even know you were being attacked? What if it looked like a natural phenomenon? That’s really what we’re in here, in my opinion. It is that kind of scenario.
So what they’ve done—and this is again my thinking about this. I didn’t read this anywhere, but I know about how this thing came about. One of the things I somewhat figured out was confirmed by a Taiwanese engineer… He said that the reason they didn’t get hit badly with this virus is that they figured it out right away because they don’t listen to the Chinese Communist Party propaganda. They have a whole department that screens their social media, and when they see something get censored, they start looking at it. That must be the truth. Now that’s something that we should start appreciating here in America today.
I believed early on in February that this was a biologically manipulated bioweapon because the minute that anybody popped up with data suggesting that, they were censored. You know the old military pilots’ dictum: when you’re catching flack, you’re over the target. So I believe that, and I think there’s a host of evidence that shows the coronavirus is a naturally occurring, very benign virus that doesn’t even give most people a cold, but at the most it gives you a common cold. It doesn’t kill you. It doesn’t make you very sick, but what they’ve done is used it as the transmission device.
So think about how we were years ago when we first came into the nuclear age. We couldn’t easily distribute nuclear weapons. We had to drop them onto the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. We just had to take them in a plane, but later the hard part was actually the guided missile technology. So in bioweapons we had this problem over the years. The one I was very worried about was smallpox, but most of these bioweapons were either hard to distribute or there was treatment for them. The problem here is distribution. Remember the anthrax thing [after 2001/09/11]? It went out in envelopes. It went to Congress, but it’s hard to distribute anthrax. It might be deadly to some people, but it’s hard to distribute. So how do we make a missile? The missile is the coronavirus which is a highly transmissible, very small-particle virus. It can’t be masked away no matter what the propaganda says. You can’t hide from it behind a plastic little screen that costs businesses too much money. It’s just incredibly transmissible, but it’s very benign. Now add to that what is basically the warhead. The warhead is a little protein that they tacked on that attaches to your ACE-2 pathway. Human beings have these ACE-2 pathways that are somewhat genetically determined, and when you put on this hook—what they call the spike protein, then it gets into these ACE-2 pathways. So now it is in your heart, in your lungs, in your testicles, in your brain, and it can kill you now. I believe that is what happened here. We can argue about whether it was deliberate, let out purposely, but I can’t prove that. It was either accidentally released or it was let out purposely, but whatever.
When it first came out, like many viruses, I believe that the first generation was more deadly. It came out and it did kill a lot of people in Wuhan. It did kill people in Lombardy. I tell people there’s a problem when doctors are dying, and doctors and nurses in Lombardy were dying… It does help to go to your basement, but you can’t then go out to have a beer or go to the grocery store. That’s just shutting down people’s businesses for economic warfare, but real isolation against something like smallpox works. So anyway it first came out in Lombardy. It went to New York. That was probably the first generation virus, and it did kill a bunch of people initially, but just like most viruses, almost all viruses that I know of, as they pass through the human host they get weaker. This is just an adaptive advantage. If you’re the Napoleon of viruses and you want to take over the world, you don’t want to kill every host you come across. You’re not going to spread. So you become less deadly but more transmissible, and that’s what this has done over time. That’s my belief about the big picture here.
But as soon as this thing came out, it became very easy for other things to piggyback onto it. And if this was a planned release, then we’re talking about planned warfare. If it was an accidental release, then we’re talking about warfare that was piggybacked on to this accidental release. They’ve used it to create fear, and fear is an incredible psychological manipulator of populations… They’ve taken down our economy. They’re taking down a generation of children with these stupid masks. They’re damaging us in all sorts of ways, and it’s a psychological operation (psy-op) at this point because here’s the other thing we learned. And I don’t think they expected us doctors like myself… we had nothing to do when we were shut down. We were sitting at home and what do we do? Our response is to study, and we learned lots of things. In fact, I found out that we had treatment for viruses probably going back into the late 1970s.
… I called my friend in Florida, an internal medicine professor with a forty-year career, a real medicine doctor. I asked him if he had ever heard that we could treat viruses with some kind of antimicrobial agent? No, he had never heard that. So this is the biggest lie. I tried to publish a paper about it, but they made me tone down the title… It’s about the fact that they’ve lied to us for forty years about this treatment. So here’s the big picture.
If you bring out a virus like this, you don’t need to talk about vaccines. Why do we have vaccines? We have vaccines because, for example, we didn’t have treatment for smallpox, and it was a very deadly disease, so it made sense to have a vaccine. We didn’t have treatment for polio initially, so it made sense to have a vaccine, but this [Covid-19], even without doing anything, this disease has a 99.991 chance of survival in the last viral season. I call it a viral season because it really isn’t just a flu season anymore, but in the winter season that’s what our last season was. In that horrible season, including New York and everything, the overall survival in the world as opposed to a standard viral flu season, that rate was 99.992%. You see the big difference? So number one, it’s not all that deadly, but number two, we actually have a treatment for this that works extremely well in spite of all the propaganda and the attempts to falsify the medical literature, which they’ve gotten caught at, and the attempts to just dismiss anything they don’t agree with… We have a treatment for it and it really does work, so we don’t need a vaccine. And you ask, “Why would they hide treatment?” Well, I can come up with two reasons. One is that your $69 billion vaccine industry would go to zero if you had an effective treatment for all these viral airborne diseases, right? So mumps, measles… It might help all of these. We don’t know completely yet.
You’re talking about things like chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, right?
And Ivermectin. Yes, and there are probably others. These are called lysosomotropic agents. One of my friends called me. He’s an anesthesiologist, trained in India initially, and he was so excited that he called me in the middle of the night when we first heard about it, before Trump said anything—because they first said they didn’t want to go along with this because “orange man bad”. They just didn’t want anything that Trump said was good, but we actually knew about it beforehand, and it’s much bigger than anything to do with Trump—so he said, “I think I know how these things work.” He got out his old textbook of infectious disease and biochemistry from India and he figured it out. I said if that’s the way it works, we should be able to find other medications, and then I found the term lysosomatropic agents, and I started looking for these. It turns out there are a number of them, but what’s the reason they don’t want you to know? Well, the $69 billion vaccine industry would go to zero, but even more than that, if we are at biowarfare right now, as a part of this multi-dimensional warfare, if you have a treatment in your back pocket, they cannot terrorize you with viruses. And that’s important because the way they’ve made this experimental vaccine (it’s really not a vaccine)—what they’re calling the Pfizer vaccine, this Moderna vaccine, this RNA thing—it doesn’t prevent transmission, by their own admission. And even if it did, it is created to act on the warhead part of this deal, the spike protein.
One of the other things I learned, sadly, is that there are these bioweaponeers all over the country, and that we have funded them. Think about this. We have funded a [Chinese] PLA virologist to come and work in our army bioweapons lab. That is the height of insanity or treason.
Under the Clinton administration, by the way, it was completely illegal to have non-aligned foreign students, so if you were from Iran or some place that was not one of our allies, you couldn’t even work in a biology lab that worked with lesser pathogens, any pathogens that could be used as a bioweapon. Suddenly we’ve gone from that stance under the Clinton administration to the Obama administration actually funding PLA Chinese communist virologists to work in our bioweapons lab. It’s absolute insanity, but I found out that there are these guys we have. There are more bioweaponeers than I anticipated. I knew the Soviets had them… but I didn’t realize how many were generally in the world.
So they can create another little thing to go on this coronavirus now. They got the missile technology. They can put whatever they want on there, and every year you’d have to have a different vaccine, so don’t think that, even if you believe this type of vaccine will work, which I don’t… even if you believe that, it’s not a permanent solution. Viruses are all around us. They’re part of nature. We lived with them for millennia. We’ll live with them, hopefully, if we survive all this, another few millennia with them, but we have to have a solution that doesn’t involve a vaccine of any kind. And we have those solutions. We have treatment and we have prevention. So not only is hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine good for treatment, it’s good for prevention. But the other thing is you can improve your own immune system through supplements. Big pharma doesn’t ever want you to do that, but there’s no question about it.
When I was sitting at home getting mad, I thought for all the billions of dollars we pay the CDC, why do they not focus on the people getting really, really sick and dying? If you do, you see a bimodal distribution … most people, more than 90 per cent of people, just never really get sick with this. They get a little sick or they get a flu-like thing, but they walk away from it, and then there’s a very small percentage of people that are in the ICU or dying. Who are those people? Well the CDC, for all that money they have, never looked at it. The Indonesians did, and they found out that the biggest factor is vitamin D level. If it was above 30, your chance of being in the hospital or the ICU was less than four percent… So the best thing people can do is get their vitamin D level up, and the sun doesn’t do it enough. So that’s my big overall view of this thing, and I do think it’s part of a takedown of America.
That is absolutely fascinating, Dr. Merritt, and do you know what’s funny? Without being a medical professional, without having read all the literature, I was coming to similar conclusions just from what I could discern from what was in the press. So, a little bit more on these vaccines. You know it’s a hot topic. Just yesterday Biden [January 13th, 2021] put out a tweet saying that he’s going to ensure that every American gets this vaccine. I hope that doesn’t include me. Do you have any concerns about the safety of the vaccine? Would you recommend it to your patients if you were practicing? Would it depend on their risk profile?
I have lots of concerns, not the least of which is for the integrity and the moral turpitude of the of the medical profession because we should never force people to have a medical treatment, and no matter how you look at it, having a vaccine of any kind—whether it’s a flu vaccine or this—is a medical treatment. Nobody should be coerced or forced to have it. And by the way, that’s what we hung doctors for after World War II in Germany—for violating that principle. We shouldn’t be doing it. I always tell people I’m not going to tell you whether to get a vaccine or not. You have to make your decision, but you should be allowed to have informed consent. And now if you put up the package insert for a vaccine on your Facebook page, it can get taken down. So let’s just keep this in mind here. We’re not getting informed consent here. We might think we are, but we’re not.
So if you look at the history of these vaccines just real quickly, you see these are experimental biologics. I don’t even like to call them vaccines because classically how vaccines work is like this: you grow a bunch of the pathogens. Let’s say it’s measles. You grow the measles in a vat or in eggs, and then you take a portion of that and you make it less strong. You attenuate it. You make it weaker and there are different ways of doing that. Then you inject it into people, and their own immune system sees that weakened pathogen and then they react to it just enough so that it puts it in their immunologic memory. Then when they’re exposed to it the next time, they have memorized it, and theoretically they can then better respond. That’s what your body does when it gets sick. Without vaccination, you get sick with a virus, then you get perfect lifelong immunity for the most part and it’s over.
What is different with this new vaccine is they’re not giving you a pathogen, or a piece of a pathogen, or a small piece with a with an adjuvant, which is a chemical that makes your immune system react more. What they’re doing is programming mRNA—which is like DNA—but it’s the messenger RNA that makes proteins in the body. It’s kind of like a computer chip that you put into a 3D printer. Then you tell it what you want it to make, and it prints it out, right? We have that in engineering, and this is the biologic equivalent. I make up some mRNA and it tells your body to produce certain things. In this case, they’ve made a piece of this mRNA to create, in every cell of your body, that spike protein, or at least part of it. You’re actually creating the pathogen in your body, so this is where it gets a little vague about how much of that spike protein is actually being created, and I don’t know how to find that out, but I’m sure somebody knows. The problem is what happened in the animal studies. There have been four different vaccines and three different animal studies that I know of in ferrets and cats… After Sars-1, they did cats, and then after MERS—which are both coronavirus pathogens that are more deadly—they tried it in ferrets. All the animals died. It wasn’t subtle. They didn’t die of the vaccine. What they died from was called immune enhancement or antibody-induced enhancement, or antibody-dependent enhancement. They call it ADE now, but they used to call it immune enhancement.
Here’s what happens. They make the RNA… You get the vaccine and you do fine. Then you challenge the animal with the virus that you’re supposed to be immunizing against. When they challenged those cats with Sars-1, instead of killing the virus or weakening it, this stylized immune response that they built into the system went out and coated the virus, so the virus came into the body like a Trojan horse, unseen by the cat’s immune system, and then it replicated without being checked and killed the cat with overwhelming sepsis and cardiac failure. In the ferrets that happened every time they tried this. So let me just point out we have never made it through an animal study successfully for this type of vaccine. We have never done this in humans before, at least we haven’t. Maybe the Chinese have, and I’ll talk about that in a second, but that’s why we don’t really have a track record of success.
This vaccine was rolled out to distribution centers before they even made a show of caring about the FDA approving it. I know that it went out for distribution in Nebraska. It was in the distribution center days before the FDA even said they were going to approve it. I’ve never seen that happen before. And the longest they’ve really followed people after the vaccine is two months. That’s not enough time to know that we won’t have that antibody enhancement problem.
And I will make this military point. This is a perfect binary weapon. There’s no way I know exactly what that mRNA is programmed to do, and neither do you, and neither do most doctors. The doctors can’t get that data. Only the guys at the very top of this project know, but we don’t know. They say it’s coding the spike protein, but how do we prove it? We don’t know. So if I were China and I wanted to take down our military, that’s easy. I make something I could hook onto this coronavirus like the spike protein, or something else, another protein, and I just make mRNA to code that. But I know it doesn’t exist in nature, so nobody’s going to die from the vaccine, and then two years later I release the counterpart, and it causes this immune-enhancement death, so it’s a delayed death. That’s what binary poisons are. They’re delayed. They give you part one because the poisoner can walk away, and then you accidentally get in contact with part two and die. And you can’t trace it.
That’s not a hypothetical threat. There was a leak of members of the Chinese Communist Party out of Shanghai and there were hundreds of them working in Pfizer and Astra-Zeneca and Glaxo-Smith-Kline, the companies that were making these vaccines. That is absolutely terrifying.
So we’re going to trust them, right? They’re acting in our best interest?
Where do we go from here? Dr Merritt, in the last few minutes that we have left, what are your concerns about what’s coming on the horizon. I’ve talked to doctors who have said maybe we’re coming up to a Covid 2021, some variation of this. They’ve talked about this coronavirus mutation that’s now supposed to be seventy times more virulent. I don’t even know what that means. I don’t know how you measure it.
Well, that’s the one from Britain. Don’t even worry about that. That’s just chump change. What they’re saying is it’s more transmissible. That’s like saying I was going 95 on the freeway but now I’m going to go 97. Don’t worry about that transmissibility. We don’t care if this is so transmissible. It’s making it a little bit worse, but it’s not going to be the problem. Lethality is what you’re worried about, and that’s what we’re not talking about. Now they could come out with something else, but again if you come out with something that’s based on these airborne viruses like corona, we pretty much have a treatment, which is the hydroxychloroquine or the Ivermectin, so why are they trying so hard?
We need to take back our world from the virology bad boys by having a supply of Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine available. Now notice that two hydroxychloroquine plants burned down, and they said they weren’t hydroxychloroquine plants. But they made the precursors to hydroxychloroquine. So you’re being lied to at every turn, but we need to stand up now. I’m proud to say Governor Ricketts in Nebraska is one of the five governors who has not restricted hydroxychloroquine in any way shape or form. Everybody needs to push their governor to stop signing this stuff that’s being brought to us by the medical universities that are all being paid by Fauci and the NIH. Let’s get over this, and let’s give our people the ability to defend themselves. This is like saying we’re going to have missiles incoming, but you can’t build sandbags. You can’t have a basement. You can’t have a bomb shelter. That’s not right. You should be able to have a defense.
Doctors should be aware of the defense. We have got to quit lying about the defense, and we need to tell people there are five or six things you can take. I have a little kit in my office. In it is vitamin C, vitamin D, zinc, selenium and quercetin. And if you take them, you can improve your immune response and your own ability to fight this off and not get terribly sick. It’s possible that they are going to come around with more dangerous things, though, in the future, and then we will need more than that, so that’s why we have to get the truth out. People have to push out the news that we have treatment and patients are not getting it, which is sad. Patients are afraid to go to hospitals because they know they’re not going to get the right treatment.
That is sad, but I would just make this point to doctors. If you’re in training and you can’t speak out, you’re stuck. It’s not your fault. But I do fault everybody above that, the people that are taking the money from Fauci. The people that are taking the money from the NIH, that are willing to take that money and push Remdesivir and kill people. They’re not necessarily killing them, but they’re killing them by omitting treatment early on as outpatients. Doctors below those that are out of training have to make a moral decision here because we should be doing prophylaxis for people in nursing homes. We could be saving lives for five dollars a week. We could be saving a lot of these old people, but they don’t want to. They’re considered to be not contributing to society. That’s the thinking the Nazis went with, saying certain people are not worthy of living. We have to get over that because the doctors are making the choice to be quiet because they have a mortgage, they have two kids, and they don’t want to lose their university salary. It’s time to rethink your position. I think everybody in the medical community needs to man up and be honest here. The information’s out there. Don’t tell me there’s no evidence. They’re lying to you about the evidence. If you really make any effort on the internet, you can find the evidence, and if not, you can go to America’s Frontline Doctors (aflds.com). You can go to the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons (aapsonline.org). Many other organizations are speaking up now.
Excellent. Dr. Merritt, this was the last thing I was going to ask you. Any final websites that people should visit? The American Association of Physicians and Surgeons, which is a phenomenal group. The Front Line Doctors. Any other groups, and any parting words of wisdom for us, Dr. Merritt?
There’s the Barrington Declaration, and there’s so much if you just go to alternative sites. Sott.net has lots of good articles. I would say if you want to get out of the pandemic right now, it’s really easy. You turn off your TV. You take off your mask. You reopen your business, and you live your life. You hug your relatives. You go see your old relatives, and you have neighborhood parties because let me tell you, we cannot live in a basement. Even if you think masks work, don’t do this to your children. How many decades are we going to do this? Every winter, every year in a mask from now on? No, I’m not doing that.
Dr. Merritt, thank you so much for spending some time with us. Thank you for sharing your incredible insights.
Also by Dr. Merrit, an article with more detail on anti-viral treatments discussed in the interview:
Other questions about obvious contradictions: If Covid-19 has killed 400,000 people in the United States, why have other causes of death declined sharply and inexplicably, and why has the total number of deaths not risen sharply compared to previous years? See a recent academic paper on this topic:
James DeMeo, Orgone Biophysical Research Laboratory, Ashland, Oregon, “A Critical Review of CDC USA Data on Covid-19: PCR/Antigen Tests & Cases Reveal Herd Immunity Only, & Do Not Warrant Public Hysteria or Lockdowns,” (Preprint) January 2021:
ABSTRACT: Basic annual all-cause deaths data, when reviewed in light of a claimed Covid-19 pandemic and decadal expectations from annual increases in population growth, revealed no overall surge in USA deaths for 2020. Age-specific analysis also failed to confirm any significant increase in Covid-19 deaths among populations of high-risk elderly 65+ years as compared to all-cause deaths within the same demographic. The Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) “daily confirmed-case and confirmed-deaths” data on Covid-19 were also reviewed as plotted together on the same ordinate scale, along the vertical axis, revealing a less frightening perspective of daily confirmed death numbers from the claimed “pandemic” than is usually reported on “official science” and media websites with graphical and numerical exaggerations. Daily death/case ratios failed to affirm any significant growth or spread of an expected deadly viral pandemic, except for the initial period of March-April 2020, which quickly subsided. These direct reviews of the official CDC data, formulated within the existing paradigm of a claimed deadly SARS-CoV-2 virus and Covid-19 disease, expose multiple contradictions to basic causality and logic. Problems in PCR/Antigen tests and electron-microscopy for specific identification of SARS-CoV-2 are exposed, indicating cross-reactivity and confusions with other corona viruses and their DNA/RNA fragments, along with antibodies to them. The claimed Covid-19 tests thereby do not appear specific to the living SARSCoV-2 virus, which is why lab-confirmed cases among asymptomatic people have soared to dramatically high numbers, while lab-confirmed deaths have not. Other contradictions in CDC data were identified, and can best be understood as deaths from ordinary seasonal respiratory disorders such as influenza or pneumonia being inappropriately reclassified as Covid-19. Soaring “case” numbers therefore would reflect herd immunity only, possibly as early as May of 2020. These conclusions are not confined to the USA data, but appear global.
* “The strategy of tension is a method of social control involving a series of covert attacks upon a population, intended to promote stress and fear amongst them. The purpose is, by inducing a mistrust of one another and of the world at large, to increase child-like dependence upon perceived authority figures (such as national governments). The English phrase originates from the Italian (strategia della tensione), which was first applied to Operation Gladio in Italy during the ‘years of lead.’” (source: Wikispooks.com)
Years of Lead: “Starting in the late 1960s, Italy experienced more than a decade of violence, known as the “Years of Lead”. Armed groups on the far right and far left carried out bombings, kidnappings and assassinations. Almost 400 people were killed… At the root of the violence were armed groups on the extreme left, the best known of them being the Red Brigades. But ultra-right militias also carried out attacks just to blame their opponents—sometimes with the army, police or intelligence services complicit.” (source: France 24, December 4, 2019)